January 2008 SeeSaws – Wk 1

First Night Austin2008
I got closer to seeing it this year. I told the kids we were going, they said they wanted to go. Between going to the office, taking naps and buying fireworks, we never made it. Maybe next year : /

Stamps of ApprovalGeorge Washington Carver Museum & Cultural Center
Haven’t seen it yet.

Michael Abelman, Shawna Mouser, & Meg Stone: MaximalistElse Madsen
Paintings that look like 3D topographical maps? Even Meg Stone’s drawings can’t activate the show. BAD

Sandra LangstonDavis Gallery
I read it wrong and expected to see Sarah Higdon. Oops. Nice landscapes pleasantly amusing characters, but level of engagement is bland. BAD

(C) John Trippe: GOLD RUSHOkay Mountain
If landscapes are sofa paintings for old people, then these works are futon paintings for the youngin’s. Too harsh? There was a subdued character to the presentation. There were lots of people, but it didn’t reach feverpitch for me. There was a magazine feel to the works, mos def. More like pinups, less like paintings.  Droppin Drawers was better. NOT BAD

A Grand AffairWally Workman
Looks like Workman cleared out the second floor tenants. The works varied from tightly rendered scenes, to abstract designs, to expressive colors. My ARTHive mentor, Nathan Jensen’s colors felt richer, more concentrated/ dedicated. Ali Cavanaugh caught my eye. Photorealistic, but with soft, almost dreamlike aura. Maybe the opposite of Erin Cone? Overall, most of the works were colorful. More exciting than Davis gallery landscapes, but still not engaging enough. BAD

Donna Huanca: Secret Museum of MankindWTW
I was taken by the razzle-dazzle, the smoke and mirrors, whatever you want to call it. It was big and bright and looked good. It was crowded and actually made the space seem inadequate. But, a number of voices have pointed out some discrepancies that I did not notice. What does that mean? I’m going to look again. But I was going to do that anyway. GREAT

I’ll tell you ’bout what I sees.

7 Responses

  1. If you can’t see how great Meg Stone’s work is you need glasses, or an attention span. How am I supposed to take you seriously now?

  2. I have already expressed my appreciation for Meg Stone’s drawings.

    But just as I don’t believe one painting can carry a show, I don’t believe one artist can carry a group show.

    They’re good and I like them, but I don’t know if they necessitate calling someone blind if they don’t like them.

    How did you take me seriously before?

  3. How are we supposed to take YOU! seriously when you don’t even read his reviews.

    Got to go, I’m taking Salvo Cheque to
    lens crafters.

  4. Meg’s numerous drawings did in fact make the show great, no matter what you thought of the other work. Blind people don’t need glasses.

  5. Okay then, not blind but visually impaired.

    With my handicap, my thoughts on the show: the show is BAD

    Mr Ohlerking’s thoughts on the show: Ms. Stone’s drawings were great

    Attention span?

  6. I’m bored with this thread.

  7. It will be OK to like this show.
    http://do512.com/event/2008/02/07/nonet
    For realz.

Leave a Reply